When I started running seven years
ago, I could manage only about a quarter of a mile before I had to stop.
Breathless and aching, I walked the next quarter of a mile, then I jogged the
next quarter of a mile, alternating these two activities for a couple of miles.
Within a few weeks I could jog half way round Hampstead Heath without
stop-ping. Soon I started to run up the quarter-mile slope to the top of
Parliament Hill, although I had to stop at the top to get my breath back. Eventually
I found that I could even manage to get up the hill comfortably. I started to
run because I felt desperately unfit. But the biggest pay-off for me was—and
still is— the deep relaxation that I achieve by taking exercise. It tires me
out but I find that it does calm me down. In those early days I saw few other
runners. Now there are many more—and not just the macho sports freaks. Men and
women of all ages have now taken up running. Some 25,000 runners aged five to
85 are attracted each year to the Sunday Times Fun Run in Hyde Park. In the
last two years the London Marathon has become the biggest British sporting
event— overtaking the boat race and the Derby in the number of spectators it
attracts. When I started to jog I never dreamt of running in a marathon, but in
1982 I realized that if I trained for it, it was within my reach, and after a
slow, six-month build-up I man-aged the 26.2 miles in just under four hours. A
creditable performance for a first-timer and a far cry from those days when I
had to stop for breath after a quarter of a mile. What about heart attacks?My story shows that an unfit 39-year-old,
as I was when I started running, who had taken no serious exercise for 20
years, can do the marathon—and that this is a sport in which women can beat
men. But is it crazy to do it? Does it make sense to run in the expectation of
becoming healthier? What about the chances of injuring yourself or dying of a
heart attack? I was personally convinced of the health benefits of running
because I felt unfit, and I wasn't worried about the risk of a heart attack,
because I was not a smoker and I was sticking to a fairly low animal-fat diet.
But one person I knew well did die immediately after a jog and plenty of people
told me I was mad to start running. Reassuring
evidence now comes from doctors
in Seattle, showing that vigorous exercise actually reduces the chances of
heart attack. They found that people who had a sudden heart attack when they
appeared to be completely fit had taken less exercise than those of similar
age. According to their findings, published in the Journal of the American
Medical Association (volume 248, p 3113) it is necessary to take 20 minutes of
vigorous exercise at least two or three days a week to obtain some protection
from heart attack. Apart from jogging, the exercise might be swimming, singles
tennis or squash, digging or chopping wood. Whatever it is, the exercise should
leave you out of breath. There is a small risk of unaccustomed stress causing a
heart attack when a person is very unfit, but this can be reduced if exercise
is always increased in easy stages. My advice is: if you are under 40, are
healthy and feel well, you can begin as I did by jogging gently until you are
out of breath, then walking, and alternating the two for about two miles. Build
up the jogging in stages until you can do the whole distance comfortably. At
first, two or three times a week will probably be enough. People over 40 who
are in any doubt about their health should see their doctor before starting an
exercise program. Over-40s should begin by making a vigorous walk of at least
two miles part of the daily routine. When you can do this comfortably you can
start the mixed jogging and walking routine and progress from there. You will
have to expect soreness of muscles and joints to begin with. If soreness
changes to pain, or if you find that you suffer from deep tiredness which you
cannot shake off, then stop jogging for a while and just walk.
|